<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kontact Status</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/</link>
	<description>My Blogs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Nice to see some work on this front.

A few things about the interface:

The folderview is pretty much useless in this state. No single foldername is visible in it&#039;s entirety. Instead of the &quot;...&quot;, just print the name until the end of screen space and then cut it off. Remove the &quot;unread&quot; and &quot;total&quot; columns and just instead put the number of unread mails in brackets behind the folder name and then you have twice amount the space for the folder name and a lot less clutter as a bonus.

The favorite folder view on top of the program also looks very cluttered due to varying width of the items. Don&#039;t know what to do about that though. Wordwrap, fixed width with cutoff maybe. Also, it wastes a lot of vertical space due to there being a lot of whitespace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see some work on this front.</p>
<p>A few things about the interface:</p>
<p>The folderview is pretty much useless in this state. No single foldername is visible in it&#8217;s entirety. Instead of the &#8220;&#8230;&#8221;, just print the name until the end of screen space and then cut it off. Remove the &#8220;unread&#8221; and &#8220;total&#8221; columns and just instead put the number of unread mails in brackets behind the folder name and then you have twice amount the space for the folder name and a lot less clutter as a bonus.</p>
<p>The favorite folder view on top of the program also looks very cluttered due to varying width of the items. Don&#8217;t know what to do about that though. Wordwrap, fixed width with cutoff maybe. Also, it wastes a lot of vertical space due to there being a lot of whitespace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Dread Knight, October 4th, 2009 at 18:42
That GUI looks like crap atm :\

toma, October 4th, 2009 at 18:47
@Dread Knight Would be nice if you explain why it looks like crap instead of this useless comment.

I think Dread Knight meant widget theme. And I agree - it&#039;s ugly (see problematic zones here - http://img41.yfrog.com/img41/9759/mailodyinkontact.png ). BTW - this is one of the questions that i have for years - why there no decent default theme for GTK and Qt apps? At least like in Windows 3.11?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dread Knight, October 4th, 2009 at 18:42<br />
That GUI looks like crap atm :\</p>
<p>toma, October 4th, 2009 at 18:47<br />
@Dread Knight Would be nice if you explain why it looks like crap instead of this useless comment.</p>
<p>I think Dread Knight meant widget theme. And I agree &#8211; it&#8217;s ugly (see problematic zones here &#8211; <a href="http://img41.yfrog.com/img41/9759/mailodyinkontact.png" rel="nofollow">http://img41.yfrog.com/img41/9759/mailodyinkontact.png</a> ). BTW &#8211; this is one of the questions that i have for years &#8211; why there no decent default theme for GTK and Qt apps? At least like in Windows 3.11?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jucato</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jucato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Your line about Plasma in Kontact immediately reminded me of Spicebird (someone referred it to me some time ago)http://www.spicebird.com/category/image-galleries/spicebird-screenshots/spicebird-beta-07-screenshots :)

One thing I do wonder is whether it will be (technically?) possible for an individual application not to crash Kontact (and therefore close all other applications) when it crashes. I had this experience with it a few releases ago that Akregator would crash everything, so I ended up not using Kontact at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your line about Plasma in Kontact immediately reminded me of Spicebird (someone referred it to me some time ago)<a href="http://www.spicebird.com/category/image-galleries/spicebird-screenshots/spicebird-beta-07-screenshots" rel="nofollow">http://www.spicebird.com/category/image-galleries/spicebird-screenshots/spicebird-beta-07-screenshots</a> :)</p>
<p>One thing I do wonder is whether it will be (technically?) possible for an individual application not to crash Kontact (and therefore close all other applications) when it crashes. I had this experience with it a few releases ago that Akregator would crash everything, so I ended up not using Kontact at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toma</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>toma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-932</guid>
		<description>@sebas Okido, I&#039;ve just changed it to show &#039;Mail&#039;. Thanks all for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sebas Okido, I&#8217;ve just changed it to show &#8216;Mail&#8217;. Thanks all for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebas</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>sebas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-931</guid>
		<description>@toma The common case is to only use one email client :-)

I understand that it can be really handy for email client developing, but that also doesn&#039;t seem a too common business ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@toma The common case is to only use one email client :-)</p>
<p>I understand that it can be really handy for email client developing, but that also doesn&#8217;t seem a too common business ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsms</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>dsms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-930</guid>
		<description>I like the GUI. keep going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the GUI. keep going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-929</guid>
		<description>I wanted to say the same about mail too. Normally a user should be only using one mail program. How about determening the component which can claim the name &quot;Mail&quot; by the one the user chooses in user setting? So for 99% of the users this will work this way, no matter which client they choose. If a user chooses to activate a second mail client, either both appear with their application name or the application which is not the standard app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to say the same about mail too. Normally a user should be only using one mail program. How about determening the component which can claim the name &#8220;Mail&#8221; by the one the user chooses in user setting? So for 99% of the users this will work this way, no matter which client they choose. If a user chooses to activate a second mail client, either both appear with their application name or the application which is not the standard app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-928</guid>
		<description>As an end user of the Kontact program,the program is more &quot;Information Central&quot; than a business tool.

One feature that puts Kontact above the others, is being able to &quot;drag&quot; an e-mail to the calendar as an event.

I&#039;ve been looking for work, and the e-mail/event is more of a permanent record of a job search than to-dos - to-dos are less secure as to the purge function.

Being able to &quot;link&quot; a journal to an event would be a plus also.

Otherwise, an excellent PIM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an end user of the Kontact program,the program is more &#8220;Information Central&#8221; than a business tool.</p>
<p>One feature that puts Kontact above the others, is being able to &#8220;drag&#8221; an e-mail to the calendar as an event.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for work, and the e-mail/event is more of a permanent record of a job search than to-dos &#8211; to-dos are less secure as to the purge function.</p>
<p>Being able to &#8220;link&#8221; a journal to an event would be a plus also.</p>
<p>Otherwise, an excellent PIM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toma</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>toma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-927</guid>
		<description>@sebas If I enable KMail there will be two times a &#039;Mail&#039;.
@Dread Knight Would be nice if you explain why it looks like crap instead of this useless comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sebas If I enable KMail there will be two times a &#8216;Mail&#8217;.<br />
@Dread Knight Would be nice if you explain why it looks like crap instead of this useless comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dread Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.omat.nl/2009/10/04/kontact-status/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Dread Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omat.nl/?p=453#comment-926</guid>
		<description>That GUI looks like crap atm :\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That GUI looks like crap atm :\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

